I had a look at your question Chuck and came up with this: as long as they are all in seperate deals, I think it's OK. It would look something like: [u]

Initial deal:

Weber to Sandpoint
Hedman and Seguin to Penthouse

---------10 months pass--------------

Deal 1:
Weber back to Penthouse
Strome and Elliot to Sandpoint

Deal 2:
Hedman back to Sandpoint
Gaborik to Penthouse

Deal 3:
Seguin back to Sandpoint
DSedin to Penthouse

The end result of this all is a lot more complicated than a simple 'trade back':

Penthouse gets Weber, Gaborik and DSedin
Sandpoint gets Strome, Elliot, Hedman, and Seguin.

Looking at this, I'm thinking this would be pretty difficult for two GMs to 'conspire' from the initial deal of Weber for Hedman and Seguin. That'd be like saying "I'll give you Weber for Hedman and Seguin now, then after ten months, we'll do a series of deals that will reverse that deal and send Strome and Elliot your way with me getting Gaborik and DSedin back. Deal?"

Looks pretty complicated to me.

Thoughts?